Book study - pdf of Ishmael by Daniel Quinn
Socratic Seminar
Socratic Seminar Lesson Using Ishmael
Socratic Seminar Rubrics and Handouts from AVID
Guiding questions for discussion
PLC Meetings
Monday, September 14, 2015
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
The End of the PLC's for 2014
6/3/2014
Notes from CILT -
1. Needs Assessment - These are results of our Campus Needs Assessment. By Dr. Ortega's report, the campus assessment identifies our school mastery of Lesson Objectives, and DOLs at about 1.75. Our goal was 2.0, but she feels we are very near that goal.
2. Climate Survey - Dr. Ortega is very concerned that all of the reporting categories are still red. She remarked on the following:
Administrative support - In her opinion, the notification of additional funds for supplies and the offer to pay for staff development are evidence of administrative support. She also points out that she provided substitute teachers for the English department when they were required to grade the 200 extra essays from other schools. In light of these things, Dr. Ortega does understand this consistently low rating. She suspects that the low-ratings may be a result of disgruntled few, but she hopes that we understand that adjustments to Business and Child Guidance pathways are needed to provide relevant career opportunities for our students.
We still need more pathways. Could we create Science Pathways. Dr. Ortega has suggested Nursing, what other relevant areas?
And consider this:
Can we get some feedback here?
Fair and Consistent Discipline -
Another low-scoring area, and Dr. Ortega wants me to emphasize the importance of calls home. She remarks that often there have been no calls home when a student arrives at the office with a referral. In her opinion, by the time the student is in the office, that's the third strike, there should have been two prior calls home. Opinions? Feedback?
We have repeatedly stressed the inconsistence of contact information in Gradespeed, and I don't see a change ever coming in that area, because frankly, our students come from all over, and the information provided to get them here is often not their primary residence.
So, remember, at the beginning of next year, your best opportunity to get real information from your students is early. Get the numbers, and establish contact early, before there's ever any need to be in touch. I would suggest offering grade incentive for complete contact information, once that information is verified. I know we don't want to give out our phone numbers. What suggestions do you guys have for establishing that parent contact early?
3. Professional Development August -- Dr. Ortega feels we should complete PD by department for the most part. There have been recommendations for some full group work on Special Ed Inclusion. Dr. Ortega is still very concerned about how we engage our Special Teaching Aids in the classroom, and the consistent low scores for Special Ed. Also talk of TELPAS training.
We need suggestions for the types of Professional Development you would find most helpful. I'm interested in STEM.
4. Professional Development Next Year -- sounds as if weekly Wednesday meetings will continue. Dr. Ortega relates that these meetings are for things that cannot be communicated by email or memo, such as testing preparations.
5. Early Release -- As of Monday morning there was still some question, but we have received emails since confirming. This early release for students only, we are to work on grades and planning for next year. It sounds as if Saturday will be early day. After sign outs are complete, we have been invited to El Fenix. Ms. Poledor would like to have potluck get together on Friday. Time and place?
6. June 7th -- If you cannot be here on June 7, you need to see Dr. Ortega.
Notes from CILT -
1. Needs Assessment - These are results of our Campus Needs Assessment. By Dr. Ortega's report, the campus assessment identifies our school mastery of Lesson Objectives, and DOLs at about 1.75. Our goal was 2.0, but she feels we are very near that goal.
2. Climate Survey - Dr. Ortega is very concerned that all of the reporting categories are still red. She remarked on the following:
Administrative support - In her opinion, the notification of additional funds for supplies and the offer to pay for staff development are evidence of administrative support. She also points out that she provided substitute teachers for the English department when they were required to grade the 200 extra essays from other schools. In light of these things, Dr. Ortega does understand this consistently low rating. She suspects that the low-ratings may be a result of disgruntled few, but she hopes that we understand that adjustments to Business and Child Guidance pathways are needed to provide relevant career opportunities for our students.
We still need more pathways. Could we create Science Pathways. Dr. Ortega has suggested Nursing, what other relevant areas?
And consider this:
Science and Math Department Chairs,
Please let me know if you have any teachers who would like to go:
Robotics Training for Certified Teachers
The UT Dallas Science and Engineering Education Center will offer STEM and Robotics training sessions for teachers in July and August. If your campus plans to have a robotics team next year, the Student Activities Department will fund the expenses associated with the training. If your certified teachers are interested in training, please have them contact Andrea Guerra via andguerra@dallasisd.org by June 6, 2014.
AND
If you could present this idea to your PLC’s tomorrow….
Here is an awesome contest!! It would be great if we could get a sponsor for a Robotics team here at Adamson!
Please let me know if any teachers would be willing to sponsor a Robotics Club.
Ms. LoLecia Day
Academic Contest Coordinator
W. H. Adamson High School
Office: Room 005A
Can we get some feedback here?
Fair and Consistent Discipline -
Another low-scoring area, and Dr. Ortega wants me to emphasize the importance of calls home. She remarks that often there have been no calls home when a student arrives at the office with a referral. In her opinion, by the time the student is in the office, that's the third strike, there should have been two prior calls home. Opinions? Feedback?
We have repeatedly stressed the inconsistence of contact information in Gradespeed, and I don't see a change ever coming in that area, because frankly, our students come from all over, and the information provided to get them here is often not their primary residence.
So, remember, at the beginning of next year, your best opportunity to get real information from your students is early. Get the numbers, and establish contact early, before there's ever any need to be in touch. I would suggest offering grade incentive for complete contact information, once that information is verified. I know we don't want to give out our phone numbers. What suggestions do you guys have for establishing that parent contact early?
3. Professional Development August -- Dr. Ortega feels we should complete PD by department for the most part. There have been recommendations for some full group work on Special Ed Inclusion. Dr. Ortega is still very concerned about how we engage our Special Teaching Aids in the classroom, and the consistent low scores for Special Ed. Also talk of TELPAS training.
We need suggestions for the types of Professional Development you would find most helpful. I'm interested in STEM.
4. Professional Development Next Year -- sounds as if weekly Wednesday meetings will continue. Dr. Ortega relates that these meetings are for things that cannot be communicated by email or memo, such as testing preparations.
5. Early Release -- As of Monday morning there was still some question, but we have received emails since confirming. This early release for students only, we are to work on grades and planning for next year. It sounds as if Saturday will be early day. After sign outs are complete, we have been invited to El Fenix. Ms. Poledor would like to have potluck get together on Friday. Time and place?
6. June 7th -- If you cannot be here on June 7, you need to see Dr. Ortega.
Friday, November 15, 2013
Thursday, November 14, 2013
11/15/2013
Department:
|
Science
|
Content/Type: Science
|
Date: 11/15/2013
|
||
Facilitator:
|
Megahan
|
Start Time:8:00
|
End Time: 8:40
|
||
Evidence: Support of Key Action Plan
|
|||||
Key Action _5E1:
Leaders will facilitate "Looking at Student Work
Sessions" and will demonstrate use of rubric.
|
Evidence of Support/Assessment: Developing a common rubric to support our
looking at student work sessions.
Level 1: The Details: What details do you see in the student work – voice, content, organization, vocabulary, mechanics? Level 2: The Student's Perspective: Looking at the work from the student perspective – what was the student working on? What were they trying to do? What level of thinking were they using? What choices were they making about content, process, product, or evaluation? How much responsibility do they take for - what they learn, the process they use, and how they evaluate it? Level 3: Patterns and Conclusions: Do you see any patterns across the samples of student work? Did you see anything that was surprising? What did you learn about how a student thinks and learns? Level 4: What's Next? What new perspectives did you learn from your colleagues? What questions about teaching and learning did looking at student work raise for you? As a result of looking at student work, are there things you would like to try in your classroom to increase rigor, increase relevance, promote reflection?
Action Step: Teachers will participate in "Looking at Student
Work Sessions" and will assess
student writing using a department developed rubric.
STAAR rubric for assessing expository writing. http://curriculum.mydallasisdonline.org/file.php/1/STAAR/RLA/Latest%20STAAR%20Updates%20and%20Resources/Resources/EOC%20I,%20II,%20III/EOC%20Writing/R10%20-%20High%20School%20Expository%20Writing%20Rubric.pdf
Who Is Responsible: Science Teachers
Timeline:
|
||||
Key Action 2C1:
The Community Liaison will actively recruit parent volunteers
and ensure participation at school activities and events.
|
Evidence of Support/Assessment: Discuss school and
community events and opportunities to encourage parent participation.
Discussion: In what events have you participated? How
was parent involvement? What strategies can we put in place to increase
parent involvement?
Action Step: Recruit teachers to participate in the
Mayor’s Race on Dec 7, and solicit ideas for ways the science department can
support the “Giving Tree” project.
Who Is Responsible? Ms. Megahan
Timeline: Friday’s Meeting
|
||||
Questions for
Administration:
|
|||||
Friday, September 20, 2013
Agenda for meeting Friday, 9/27/2013, 8:15
9/27/2013
We will meet in Ms. Maldonado's room at 8:15.
Please bring your laptop, and curriculum map so you can work in content areas pulling up data.
The agenda for today's meeting:
1. Work with content teacher's to pull data, and compile a report for Dr. Ortega.
2. Focus on objectives on the curriculum map for the second six weeks.
3. Prepare an excel report to forward to Dr. Ortega.
We will meet in Ms. Maldonado's room at 8:15.
Please bring your laptop, and curriculum map so you can work in content areas pulling up data.
The agenda for today's meeting:
1. Work with content teacher's to pull data, and compile a report for Dr. Ortega.
2. Focus on objectives on the curriculum map for the second six weeks.
3. Prepare an excel report to forward to Dr. Ortega.
Monday, September 16, 2013
September 16 PLC
Short meeting this morning to establish the best time for Department PLC.
Dr. Ortega explained that we will meet two days a week. Wednesday afternoon meetings are mandatory. If there is not a school wide faculty meeting, then we are to meet in our PLC.
Data driven decision making is the topic for meetings until further notice. She doesn't have evidence of this yet.
The five teachers present voted for Friday afternoons as the best time for meetings, however, Dr. Ortega sent Ms. Elliot to veto Friday afternoon meetings.
So now we need consensus again. Shall we meet Friday mornings, or is Thurs afternoon better? I will need to reschedule tutoring.
Please reply in comments below or by email ASAP so I can plan accordingly.
So now we need consensus again. Shall we meet Friday mornings, or is Thurs afternoon better? I will need to reschedule tutoring.
Please reply in comments below or by email ASAP so I can plan accordingly.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
PLC Meeting Wednesday Afternoon 9/11
From Dr. Ortega's earlier email.
"Wednesday:
If did not cover Monday's agenda, continue or begin and add:
6. Now that we know the
weakest areas, how will we add to our maps to insure we spiral these
through the year? How and how often will we assess to ensure our
students are improving in these skills/concepts/content?
Thank you all for your continued good work.".
Please bring your curriculum map with data notes or some documentation of the data.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)













